Engagement Barriers Reflection

A reflection for workers and teams on why people may not engage with a service, looking at practical, emotional, cultural and service barriers, and what the service can change.

Preview of the first page of Engagement Barriers Reflection
Join Plus to download

Plus includes the PDF and an editable Word version.

Log in to save this resource

Also relevant for
Social workers, Youth workers
Client group
Community services workers and teams.
Practice setting
Supervision, team meetings and service reviews.
Format
Reflection activities
Details
A4 PDF, printable
Pages
2
Editable version
Word (.docx), for Plus members
Demographics
Practitioners
Age groups
Practitioners and teams
Access
Plus members
Resource code
PP-CS-026
Version
1.0

About this resource

When people do not engage, the barrier is often the service. This reflection looks at practical barriers, such as transport, times and costs, emotional barriers such as shame and past experiences, cultural barriers and service design, then identifies what the worker and service can change.

Purpose

To shift focus from 'hard to engage' clients to services that are easier to engage with.

Who it is for

Primary profession: Community services and case workers. Also relevant for social workers, youth workers.

Client or participant group: Community services workers and teams.

Practice setting: Supervision, team meetings and service reviews.

Suggested uses

  • Supervision
  • Team reflection
  • Service reviews
  • Planning outreach

Instructions for practitioners

  1. Ask clients directly what gets in the way.
  2. Look at the service through a client's eyes.
  3. Choose changes within your control.
  4. Review the effect of changes.

Accessibility considerations

Editable HTML source available for adaptation.

Scope and limitations

A reflective tool.

Research basis

A strong working alliance and routine progress feedback are among the most consistent predictors of good outcomes in therapy. Case management practice standards describe assessment, planning, coordination, review and planned exits with the person at the centre.

  • Case Management Society of Australia and New Zealand. (2013). National standards of practice for case management (3rd ed.). https://www.cmsa.org.au/
  • Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000172
  • Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J. L., & Kleinstäuber, M. (2018). Collecting and delivering progress feedback: A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000167

What is included

A 2-page printable A4 PDF, including a practitioner notes page with the research basis (version 1.0).

Originality

Original Practitioner Plus content: wording, activity structure, layout and icons were created for this resource. No third-party worksheets, illustrations or text were reproduced.

Practitioner Plus membership

Spend less time searching and more time with people.

Start with a free account, then upgrade to Plus for the full premium library, favourites and new releases.